Nut Flush Draw on the Button for the Rec

Home Forums Share Your Hand No Limit Holdem 2-5 Nut Flush Draw on the Button for the Rec

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3438
    Frank H
    Participant

    2/3/5 ($2 button, $3 SB, $5 BB)

    I’ve got ~$700 behind and get dealt A9dd on button
    UTG (~$400, tight, new at table, just lost with AQ to a K on river) makes it $15
    UTG+1 (~$700, tight, tired, been at table for hours) calls
    HJ (~450, aggressively raises weak hands and has been stacked 2x already) calls
    Button (me, fresh off a flopped set against UTG1 and calling down a bluff with an overpair which made me even for the night..) completes with suited ace.

    Flop: Jd 7d 5h
    Pot ~$50

    UTG bets $50. Board is dry – I immediately assume defending top pair.
    UTG1 get out of the way (and goes to sleep)
    HJ raises to $150. I imagine another J here, possibly AJ, or a J7 that made 2pair, but all I can think about is “I’m drawing to the nut flush and have a ~30% chance of getting there,” so I call the raise.
    UTG then shoves for his remaining $300ish
    HJ snap shoves.. and I’m concerned, but am looking at putting another $300 into the pot in order to get a triple up with any diamond, so I call.

    Board runs out Kc As
    UTG had J and mucks
    HJ turns over J with K kicker that paired on the turn

    Variance, or was I an idiot?
    Was a 4bet warranted pre-flop, or should I be more willing to fold a suited ace in position with a nut flush draw when the flop is bet and re-raised?

    #3440
    Jack Hamilton
    Participant

    The pots $250 when you need to call another $150 to win the pot. so 250-150 or 5-3 so 60%

    You have a possible 9 cards that can win you the pot so about 35% chance.

    Therefore the ideal is to fold in that situation

    #3584
    Kyle Sweeney
    Participant

    The math in the above post is not correct. This is actually a scenario where even though you’re drawing for the nuts, your opponents cards really matter quite a bit.

    The 35% to win is assuming only the nut flush would be good, meaning your opponent has AJ. Also, this and every other percentage below are assuming you see a river which I mention more below. You’re only 19% to catch on the turn, so you need to calculate the odds you think you’ll pay if you get to the river.

    Any opponent other than AJ materially changes the odds. Any other pair of jacks or pockets better than your 9 (as turned out to be the case) increases your outs by 3 aces to 12 total, up to about 45% before we take away his 3 king & 2 jack redraws. Call it 44%. In this case the pot was 3-ways with Jx mucked meaning 7 redraws, call it 43%

    However, if your opponent has 2 pair or a set already, not only is your ace not good, but you’re dodging far more redraws. J5, 75, or any set take away the 5d from your outs. Other 2 pair/sets make 4-10 cards in the deck into full boat cards which backs you to ~31% (j7), ~28% (J5,75), ~23% (any set).

    So the reason I responded here is to note how nut draws are often oversimplified, even though it seems like they’re straight forward. 23% to 41% is a huge difference (and this doesn’t count opponents like 8d6d or 6d4d where you’re way in the lead).

    The percentage regarding the direct odds for your first call would be $150 for a pot of $400 total after the call, or 37.5%. That’s irrelevant because it just seems too unlikely you’ll see the river without paying more. Implied odds here are likely UTG folds and all-in on the turn so $450:$1000 (45% i.e. fold), or if the UTG calls or shoves $450:$1400 (31% i.e. ehhhhhhh?).

    In hindsight it was a good call. 3-way pot against players sharing top pair, your ace is good means 43% from the first bullet point means you’ll put in 100%/43% * $450 = $1047 to get $1400 in the long run. Had UTG folded it would have been a bad call. Had any opponent had a set it would have been a bad call. 2-pair and it’s break-even at best.

    I would almost never make this call. While pro players can concern themselves with the “correct” play nearly 100% of the time, most of us have other things to think about. Getting it in with a draw on a pot you’re stuck $15 in means you are PROBABLY going to lose money right now, even though your eventual profits might exceed losses. And even though the UTG calling is what is giving you the odds, it pretty much means you’re never against Kd3d+ or other hands you’re way ahead of. Another draw like this next hand and chances are you’re down $900 or felt in a hurry trying to get a small profit. If this guy is playing as aggressive as it sounds I would wait for a spot where I’m ahead. I don’t know what your bankroll is like, but I’m a rec player and most players like me are not comfortable getting stuck that much trying to catch draws I’d so far paid $15 for. If I was up and had $1,700 instead of $700 I might give it more thought, but then again I’d usually rather allow it to play out and try to stack the aggressor on a different hand.

    Squeezing with a 3-bet from the button would not have been a bad move, although in this example I think if 2 players are getting it in with top pair OK kicker I doubt the outcome would have been different.

    You’re not going to “out play” loose players without high-equity hands.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar